Re: It works... now what?
- From: "hutch--" <hutch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 06:37:21 -0800
smile,
\~o/~///annabee wrote:
> //If you weren't such an imbicile you would know that inlined
> duplicated API calls are faster than switches to select different
> variables.//
>
> :) Didn't you say "neater" and not faster ?
If you weren't such an imbicile Wannabee you would be able to draw the
distinction as to whether clear fast code was better than obscure size
optimised code.
> //What you need is clean clear historical//
>
> :)))
If you weren't such an imbicile Wannabee you would have taken notice of
the bit you edited out INTEL SYNTAX !
> //TASM can do it, MASM can do it, GAS can do it, Pelle's assembler can
> do it, VC can do it and PowerBASIC can do it //
>
> Beees can do it as well :))))
Maybe so but WannaBEEES cannot.
Just remember masti"C"ating, not the other, we don't want you to go
blind YET. :)
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
- Re: It works... now what?
- References:
- It works... now what?
- From: #2pencil
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: Robert Redelmeier
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: hutch--
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: hutch--
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: hutch--
- Re: It works... now what?
- From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
- It works... now what?
- Prev by Date: A Watershed of Open Source software
- Next by Date: Re: A Watershed of Open Source software
- Previous by thread: Re: It works... now what?
- Next by thread: Re: It works... now what?
- Index(es):