Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald <alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 23:36:24 +0000 (UTC)
\\\o///annabee wrote:
På Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:40:53 +0000 (UTC), skrev Alex McDonald <alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
\\\o///annabee wrote:
På Wed, 4 Jan 2006 21:50:13 +0000 (UTC), skrev Alex McDonald <alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
\\\o///annabee wrote:
På 4 Jan 2006 08:46:33 -0800, skrev randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Not that many people actually *prove* that their software is correct, mind you :-)
No. Thats impossible, but provides a nice playground for you to play the "dancing master".
Google for "provably correct software" and prove it to yourself that you're a garrulous dimwit.
Why dont you post a link to the actual fact?
What, that you're an idiot? Just look in your outbox.
Theres so many insane answers to those words it would take me a week to debug it.
Don't bother then, and stay in the dark. Just stop posting nonsense.
Sure.
Here is what I found on page 7 and 8:
Of what?
(And the previuos pages was just a lot of talentless mumbojumbo with NULL content)
To which you propose adding your own variety of talentless mumbo-jumbo.
Bytecode :
[snipped]
The bytecode program is the translation of the following C fragment: S = 0; while(n > 0) S += n--;
Now, lets take a look at the "bytecode" in asm
Oh dear...
naive HLL approach :
mov D$S 0 While D$n > 0 dec n$ mov eax D$n add D$S eax End_While
Completely wrong. n-- is post-decrement.
How simple it would be written in reality.
Virtual reality, through a cloud of mind bending drugs...
xor eax eax while ecx > 0 dec ecx add eax ecx End_While
Wrong again. Same reason.
When people can mess it up to such insane levels, I take it as a complement to be called nitwit by somebody of you statue.
:))) No offense, nuclearplant !
Blimey, what are you on? I don't want any, whatever it is. It's permanently blown your frontal lobes. This reply of yours has exactly 0% to do with proving software correct, and 100% to do with you being gormless. Give up before you fuse what's left of your brain.
-- Regards Alex McDonald .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- References:
- [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: ¬a\\/b
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Jonathan Bartlett
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Bertrand Augereau
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Prev by Date: Re: CPU's cache in mind
- Next by Date: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Previous by thread: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Next by thread: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|