Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: "Evenbit" <nbaker2328@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Jan 2006 14:20:19 -0800
Frank Kotler wrote:
>
> No, I know - by "experiment" :) - that C doesn't keep track of values
> slipping out of stated limits at runtime. Results quietly become
> meaningless, unless we check for... "overflow"... hate to use that term,
> since Intel says it doesn't happen...
Then why the heck did they bother supplying an Overflow Flag??? I
figure that the Sign Flag never gets used either since everyone prefers
to use Two's-Complement instead. And, doesn't RosAsm come with a
Wannabee-written *Bit Count* macro so that we can do away with tests of
the Zero Flag??? ;-)
>
> Apparently, "signed char c = 200" is okay too. No comment.
Oh, that is for when you are coding programs for the blind. :)
Nathan.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- References:
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Betov
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Betov
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Prev by Date: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Next by Date: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Previous by thread: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Next by thread: Re: [repost]Eorros for me, in the assembly history
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|