Re: It has been done before


\\\o///annabee wrote:

> Except *nobody* has ever "argue(d) that a perfect disassembler is possible"

One word: Wolfgang.


And I will offer some latitude here, a *decent* automatic disassembler
is not possible, either. I mean, if the RosAsm disassembler is the
"best there is" and it break by just adding a NOP to a sequence of
print statements, there's not much hope for an automatic disassembler,
is there?
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.