Re: while ();
- From: "\\\\\\o///annabee" <fack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:14:09 GMT
På 30 Jan 2006 17:00:42 -0800, skrev randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
\\\o///annabee wrote:
What you claim is irrelevant from a optimization perspective.
Dude, you might want to look up "superscalar" and "pairable instructions".
:) "Dude"? You're old as betovens piano man!
I "shudder" when you call me "dude". Stop calling me "dude" you old carcass!
Annie !! I am beeing mentally abused by this old gay person!
H-E-L-P !
Cheers, Randy Hyde
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: while ();
- From: Annie
- Re: while ();
- References:
- Re: while ();
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: while ();
- From: robertwessel2
- Re: while ();
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: while ();
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: while ();
- Prev by Date: Re: while ();
- Next by Date: Re: It has been done before
- Previous by thread: Re: while ();
- Next by thread: Re: while ();
- Index(es):