Re: It has been done before
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 10:35:42 GMT
"Dragontamer" <prtiglao@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1138672975.852808.214860
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> I dunno about you, but I thought software quality measures how many
> ways
> the code *fails* and not the sucesses of the program.
Absurd. When talking of a Disassembler-Reassembler, like
RosAsm one, it is quite evident that there will _always_
be failure cases. So, the quality of such a software is
to be measured by the sizes and by the number of correctly
assumed Applications. Period.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- It has been done before
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Re: It has been done before
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Re: It has been done before
- From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: It has been done before
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: It has been done before
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: It has been done before
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: It has been done before
- From: \\\\\\o///annabee
- Re: It has been done before
- From: Dragontamer
- It has been done before
- Prev by Date: I need your help
- Next by Date: Re: I need your help
- Previous by thread: Re: It has been done before
- Next by thread: Re: It has been done before
- Index(es):