alt.lang.asm

• Thread Index

---

• Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Betov
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: The rats nets show
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: The rats nets show
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: The rats nets show
  • From: Betov
• The rats nets show
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Betov
• SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Betov
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: sevagK
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Donkey
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Donkey
• Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Santosh_7bf
• Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: bouazza92
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Betov
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: Donkey
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: sevagK
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm User Interface
  • From: o//annabee
• GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Chewy509
• RosAsm User Interface
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: kellopeli
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Error A2006
  • From: Eman
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Isaac Bosompem
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Why use assembly?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Error A2006
  • From: WhiteFox
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: ArarghMail603NOSPAM
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: ArarghMail603NOSPAM
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Sell high quality HDI PCB (CHINA)
  • From: njsldz@xxxxxxx
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Isaac Bosompem
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: santosh
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: santosh
• xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: Error A2006
  • From: santosh
• Re: Error A2006
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Error A2006
  • From: WhiteFox
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Betov
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Stripping functions from a DLL - offer wanted
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Survey
  • From: Florian Liebig
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: The Plankton metaphor
  • From: hutch--
• Re: The Plankton metaphor
  • From: sevagK
• Re: The Plankton metaphor
  • From: Frank Kotler
• The Plankton metaphor
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Include files and com files
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Guillermito
• Re: Include files and com files
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Include files and com files
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Guillermito
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Guillermito
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Betov
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Guillermito
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Guillermito
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Confusing stack effects
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: ?
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Confusing stack effects
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: sevagK
• Re: ?
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• ?
  • From: fabio de francesco
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• CodeView Info
  • From: Guga
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: disassemble and save to text
  • From: val
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: santosh
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: hutch--
• RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Betov
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: nerd_boy
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Betov
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Betov
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Seeking Developers for new language built on Assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Seeking Developers for new language built on Assembly
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Seeking Developers for new language built on Assembly
  • From: santosh
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Seeking Developers for new language built on Assembly
  • From: transfire
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: santosh
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: santosh
• bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it withoutsegfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: santosh
• 68k Assemblers for Linux?
  • From: nerd_boy
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Betov
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: santosh
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• bits 32 oddities in NASM
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Betov
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it withoutsegfaulting
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it withoutsegfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it withoutsegfaulting
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Betov
• Re: Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: rhyde
• Re: (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: rhyde
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Making HLA even more high-level.
  • From: rhyde
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: rhyde
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: rhyde
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: rhyde
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Loading 32bit kernel from bootstrap
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: rhyde
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• (minor) Random Number Generation bug in RosAsm
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: santosh
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: Betov
• Re: why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Loading 32bit kernel from bootstrap
  • From: Andreas Bauer
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: santosh
• Re: NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: Betov
• NASM pe segfaults, RosAsm dissassembles the PE and runs it without segfaulting
  • From: o//annabee
• Lots of Particles (Again)
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Ink
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Ink
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Ink
  • From: santosh
• Re: why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: santosh
• Re: why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: Dragontamer
• why we need a BSS segment?
  • From: zhangyue.zl@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: Betov
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: 64 bit assembly
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: Isaac Bosompem
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: HLA v1.81 is now available
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: o//annabee
• Congratulations, Hutch.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: HLA v1.81 is now available
  • From: santosh
• Re: Local symbol definition
  • From: Betov
• Re: HLA v1.81 is now available
  • From: Betov
• Re: HLA v1.81 is now available
  • From: Betov
• HLA v1.81 is now available
  • From: rhyde
• Local symbol definition
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: kellopeli
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Andy Kennedy
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: kellopeli
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: luke77561
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: luke77561
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Segment registers
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Slow ass registry editor
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: disassemble and save to text
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Segment registers
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Slow ass registry editor
  • From: Spaz
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Segment registers
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: disassemble and save to text
  • From: ArarghMail603NOSPAM
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Kevin G. Rhoads
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Andy Kennedy
• Re: NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• disassemble and save to text
  • From: val
• Re: NASM question
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Survey
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM question
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM question
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• NASM question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Sell high quality HDI PCB (CHINA)
  • From: njsldz@xxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Re: read port harddisk
  • From: cmk128
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Survey
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Survey
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Guillermito's Particles
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: jussij
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: bob_jenkins
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Dunny
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: bob_jenkins
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Survey
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: ldb
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 64 bit assembly
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PowerPC Asm...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• My final hope!! you lovely people.
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: ldb
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Betov
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Dunny
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: sevagK
• 64 bit assembly
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: Survey
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: PowerPC Asm...
  • From: m4cpunk
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Survey
  • From: hutch--
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Survey
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: PowerPC Asm...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: ldb
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: lea and addressing
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• lea and addressing
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Dunny
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Write Great Code Vol 2 is now available
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Survey
  • From: john chung
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Dos character input / win2k
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Dos character input / win2k
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Dos character input / win2k
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Evenbit
• I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Isaac Bosompem
• PowerPC Asm...
  • From: m4cpunk
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Survey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Write Great Code Vol 2 is now available
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Survey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Survey
  • From: johnzulu
• AsmIDE
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AsmIDE
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• AsmIDE
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Dos character input / win2k
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: santosh
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: john chung
• "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: john chung
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Dos character input / win2k
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Betov
• "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: john chung
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: ldb
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: Betov
• Re: MD5 optimization for const data's length
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: dunric
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: dunric
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: o//annabee
• Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: dunric
• Finishing up HLA Adventure
  • From: dunric
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: penang
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: nobody
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: the inline asm doesn't recognize xmm1 to 7?
  • From: ngxfer001
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: o//annabee
• the inline asm doesn't recognize xmm1 to 7?
  • From: ngxfer001
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: hutch--
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: hutch--
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: walburn
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: walburn
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: nessuno
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: nessuno
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: sevagK
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: santosh
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• x86-64 assembly problems
  • From: walburn
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: sevagK
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: toby
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: toby
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: rhyde
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: toby
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: toby
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: santosh
• Re: Input/Output
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: santosh
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Input/Output
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: read port harddisk
  • From: T933191278
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• a printf _P() for windows32
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dave
• read port harddisk
  • From: cmk128
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: hutch--
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any Standards for STDIN??
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Any Standards for STDIN??
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Betov
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: ldb
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: o//annabee
• "We Never Use Assembly Language"
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: [OT] yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Betov
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: Betov
• Re: necomer, basic input
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• necomer, basic input
  • From: patrick_woflian
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: T933191278
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Betov
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Betov
• Re: [OT] yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: AshenSouls
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: santosh
• Re: yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: santosh
• Re: yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• [OT] yes for destroy *all* atomic bombs
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: BBS test
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: BBS test
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: o//annabee
• Assembler/Compiler testing
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: \\\\\\o///annabee
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Betov
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Betov
• Re: ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• ASM noob - couple of questions
  • From: Daniel Bodnar
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: TK
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: RND contest
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: santosh
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: santosh
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: ArarghMail603NOSPAM
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: application that retrieve the number of cpu cycles, junk 'cycle' after expression
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: santosh
• Re: application that retrieve the number of cpu cycles, junk 'cycle' after expression
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: James Daughtry
• application that retrieve the number of cpu cycles, junk 'cycle' after expression
  • From: mames
• newbie: I/O with nasm
  • From: TK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: santosh
• Re: Please give me details about SMM ( system management mode)
  • From: santosh
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Please give me details about SMM ( system management mode)
  • From: thumbaijram@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: WriteProfileString help
  • From: sevagK
• Re: WriteProfileString help
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: sevagK
• WriteProfileString help
  • From: Andy Kennedy
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Some confusion on Stack operation
  • From: zhangyue.zl@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: getting the values in the notepad...
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• transfer values
  • From: prinsipe
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Chewy509
• getting the values in the notepad...
  • From: prinsipe
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Thank you Randy Hyde
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Thank you Randy Hyde
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Thank you Randy Hyde
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: program of switching from real to protected mode
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Global labels in inline assembly.
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: ldb
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (3)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: sevagK
• Re: program of switching from real to protected mode
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Global labels in inline assembly.
  • From: Todd A. Anderson
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: To what extent can frequency analysis be used to detect modern ciphers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: To what extent can frequency analysis be used to detect modern ciphers?
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: To what extent can frequency analysis be used to detect modern ciphers?
  • From: ldb
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Betov
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: Betov
• Re: read a sector
  • From: Y@xxxxxx
• program of switching from real to protected mode
  • From: vaseemcancer
• Re: Can some other instructions just follow the IRET?
  • From: Y@xxxxxx
• Re: Can some other instructions just follow the IRET?
  • From: zhangyue.zl@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can some other instructions just follow the IRET?
  • From: Y@xxxxxx
• To what extent can frequency analysis be used to detect modern ciphers?
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: Dave Turner
• Re: Ideal computer language from scratch?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: linux inline assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RND Contest (4)
  • From: Dave Turner
• RND Contest (4)
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Loading single word to a xmm register
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee