Re: newbie: I/O with nasm

santosh wrote:

....
However the
standard library is written in HLA, so, you would need to know HLA in
order to understand it.

Actually, it isn't too bad to *read*. You've gotta remember that he's got the goddam operands "backwards", but otherwise it pretty much does what it looks like it does. *Writing* code that HLA will swallow is another matter! :)

http://webster.cs.ucr.edu

An absolute *goldmine* of information, even if you have no interest at all in HLA!

Best,
Frank
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Skybucks Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
    ... Granted, Wolfgang's slap at HLA had little to do with Skybuck's idea, or the "default response". ... Tough to tell the inmates apart without a program, around here, but in my observation, Santosh is quite "well liked". ... (Skybuck might be interested in the c.l.a.x. ... And santosh has confessed to being a NASM user, which, I see, you are #3 on the Development Team. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Skybucks Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
    ... >> You just couldn't refuse ending your post without taking a stab ... >> at HLA. ... Poor little santosh. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: An HLA question...
    ... santosh wrote: ... want absolutely *zero* extra code generated by HLA. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)