Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: "James Daughtry" <mordock32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Mar 2006 09:13:28 -0800
???!!! Goldmine of stolen materials
One could debate that it's a collection of existing material such that
one doesn't have to search for weeks to find them through by searching.
These collections are all over the web; are they filled with stolen
material as well? As long as you're consistent in your views, I have no
problem with them. :-)
of massive lies
Do you have quotes? Or just hearsay? :-) I'm not saying that you're
wrong, but without sufficient proof, there's no way I can say that
you're right.
and swindlings
No need to clarify this. We all know what you mean. :-)
like the so scandalous:
< http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/WhichAsm.html >
Actually, that seems to be a pretty informative comparison, though the
bias toward HLA is expected and even mentioned explicitly in the
introduction. I found B_U_Asm to be more "scandalous" in terms of tone
and content.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: o//annabee
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- References:
- newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: TK
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: santosh
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: Betov
- newbie: I/O with nasm
- Prev by Date: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Next by Date: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Previous by thread: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Next by thread: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|