Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: o//annabee <fack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:10:32 +0100
På Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:13:28 +0100, skrev James Daughtry <mordock32@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
< http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/WhichAsm.html >
Actually, that seems to be a pretty informative comparison, though the
bias toward HLA is expected and even mentioned explicitly in the
introduction. I found B_U_Asm to be more "scandalous" in terms of tone
and content.
Then you are easily fooled, and , thats of course what gives Randall Hyde his chance at glory, because, this man has no base at all. He is a beginner, more often he knows less then the people he teaches. Randall Hyde is a person, that writes books and tutorials at the same time he is reading them from elsewhere. He is a poser.
For example,
Under the headline, "Tutorials and Educational Material"
The Swindler, Randall Hyde writes:
Spasm/RosAsm | Nothing is available for SpAsm/RosAsm that I am aware of.
Well, try to take a look here:
< http://betov.free.fr/RosAsm.html >
Still cant see what an idiot Randall Hyde is ?
He has not even gotten the name right.
HLA, is by Randall Hydes _own words_, in this very NG, a very slow PROTOTYPE for an assembler.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- References:
- newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: TK
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: santosh
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- From: James Daughtry
- newbie: I/O with nasm
- Prev by Date: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Next by Date: Re: Some confusion on Stack operation
- Previous by thread: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Next by thread: Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|