Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: "sevagK" <kahlinor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Mar 2006 16:45:11 -0800
o//annabee wrote:
På Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:40:46 +0100, skrev sevagK <kahlinor@xxxxxxxxx>:
Betov wrote:
"sevagK" <kahlinor@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1142301695.148972.226240
@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com:
Rosasm = IDE for converting written assembly to executable/dll
HIDE = IDE for converting written assembly to executable/dll/library
Rosasm: can call up debugger, resource editor, help file, etc.
HIDE can call up debugger, resource editor, help file, etc.
Both get the same job done.
If so, where are the Links to the Applications written
by the HLA victims, Pathetic idiot?
Betov.
Clown, your reply has nothing to do with the above which compares the
IDEs and productivity. Mine took less than a year of light dev time,
but its abilty to truly integrate with software allows it to compare
nearly feature to feature to your IDE which took a decade of heavy dev
time.
Time to program FASM ?
+ time for Hla 9 years
+ time for HLAParse ?
+ time for the external debugger?
+ your one year
= ????
Not only did it take much less time, but the quality of the
tools it can integrate with are far superior to anything you've bolted
onto Rosasm over the years.
:) I am to tired at laughing.
Careful, you might bust a gut.
Looks like you got the point though. With true ingtegration, one can
capitalize on the works others have done and cut down their own
development time. Not only that, but the people who do concentrate on
single aspects of the system produce better tools then someone who
tries to jam in everything on his own. Case in point: Rosasm... a
jumble of components in various stages of completion, not a single
component stands out above individual components coded by others.
-sevag.k
www.geocities.com/kahlinor
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- References:
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: Betov
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: rhyde
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: Betov
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: Dragontamer
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: Spam Killer
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: Betov
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: sevagK
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- From: o//annabee
- Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- Prev by Date: Re: AsmIDE
- Next by Date: Re: x86-64 assembly problems
- Previous by thread: Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- Next by thread: Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading