Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Mar 2006 14:58:21 GMT
"James Daughtry" <mordock32@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1143730021.393320.82510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
I have a better idea. How about you explain *why* it's more secure so
that I stop asking you why. Tell me why you chose this feature despite
common practice. Give me details so that I'll understand. Keep in mind
that I'll keep asking until I'm satisfied that I understand your
reasoning.
Well, i already explained. Having the Caret vanishing up or
down when you scroll, so that you can no more know at what
place you are going to write to, is something utterly
inacceptable. Nowadays, everybody is used to this demential
behaviour of the Caret, but this is not a reason for making
a Source Editor as bad as this.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: o//annabee
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: o//annabee
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- References:
- RosAsm User Interface
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: Betov
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: James Daughtry
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: Betov
- Re: RosAsm User Interface
- From: James Daughtry
- RosAsm User Interface
- Prev by Date: Re: RosAsm User Interface
- Next by Date: Re: RosAsm User Interface
- Previous by thread: Re: RosAsm User Interface
- Next by thread: Re: RosAsm User Interface
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|