alt.lang.asm

• Thread Index

---

• Re: NAND
  • From: ArarghMail604NOSPAM
• Re: NAND
  • From: TS
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: Betov
• Re: I'm having trouble finding opcodes
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: I'm having trouble finding opcodes
  • From: Frank Kotler
• NAND
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: The_Sage
• I'm having trouble finding opcodes
  • From: corey
• Re: I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: santosh
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: pzgyuanf
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: pzgyuanf
• Re: I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: A. Ecoffet
• Re: I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: frame pointer
  • From: Julienne Walker
• frame pointer
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
  • From: pzgyuanf
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• I'd like to learn asm...
  • From: A. Ecoffet
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Doubts about Segmentation
  • From: robertwessel2
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: Smike
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: .
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: HLA vs ???
  • From: .
• Re: Doubts about Segmentation
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• HLA vs ???
  • From: .
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Float to ASCII - the classic ftoa();
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• (ANNOUNCE) HLA Standard Library at SF
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Ultra Newb question
  • From: cozofdeath
• Re: Ultra Newb question
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Ultra Newb question
  • From: cozofdeath
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: silk.odyssey
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Float to ASCII - the classic ftoa();
  • From: Chewy509
• Linux: output redirection to another shell
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Guga
• Re: Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: sevagK
• Alphablending
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Guga
• Re: Convert an ip address to long value
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Learning MMX
  • From: ldb
• Learning MMX
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: sevagK
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: I am having a hard time with this code...
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: C
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Guga
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Guga
• Re: Convert an ip address to long value
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: I am having a hard time with this code...
  • From: Spam Killer
• I am having a hard time with this code...
  • From: uraniumore235
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Eman
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Frank Kotler
• How can I debug assembler pgm using Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: john chung
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: How can I debug assembler pgm using Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: How can I debug assembler pgm using Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: ArarghMail604NOSPAM
• Re: How can I debug assembler pgm using Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Christian Christmann
• How can I debug assembler pgm using Visual Studio 2005?
  • From: Ken Applequist
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Betov
• Re: read port harddisk
  • From: Doors
• Re: read a sector
  • From: Doors
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Standard NASM Macros
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: Betov
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: Betov
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: sevagK
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: overflow for double (64 bits float)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Standard NASM Macros
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: overflow for double (64 bits float)
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: hutch--
• overflow for double (64 bits float)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• writing shared object with hla under linux
  • From: nemrout
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: load immediate
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Jump versus Branch
  • From: ldb
• Re: OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• OT: Warning for people using glasses/lences
  • From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free
• load immediate
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Jump versus Branch
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: kellopeli
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: sevagK
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: aerial (antenna)
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Code formatting errors are not guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: NASM macros, defines that will be used later
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Style Guidelines
  • From: hutch--
• Style Guidelines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: basic tsr and interrupt hooking
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: basic tsr and interrupt hooking
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: basic tsr and interrupt hooking
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM macros, defines that will be used later
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: NASM macros, defines that will be used later
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM macros, defines that will be used later
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: basic tsr and interrupt hooking
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: aerial (antenna)
  • From: santosh
• Re: [OT] aerial (antenna)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• [OT] aerial (antenna)
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: New computer
  • From: David Welch
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: cozofdeath
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: cozofdeath
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Dragontamer
• GetPrivateProfileInt help
  • From: Andy Kennedy
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ldb
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• NASM macros, defines that will be used later
  • From: liquidx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Guga
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: Just started ASM...
  • From: cozofdeath
• Just started ASM...
  • From: cozofdeath
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• basic tsr and interrupt hooking
  • From: mamnun . bd
• Re: Why doesn't this work?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why doesn't this work?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Dragontamer
• New computer
  • From: john chung
• Re: Why doesn't this work?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Why doesn't this work?
  • From: thedov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: santosh
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: santosh
• on reduce instruction lenght
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Guga
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Randall, Any HLA Updates Planned?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: 8086 Help
  • From: john chung
• Re: Cherche des experts en assembleur
  • From: bouazza92
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: sevagK
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: sevagK
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: santosh
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: 8086 Help
  • From: anathema7g@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: assembly with c and c++ on linux
  • From: Lopez
• assembly with c and c++ on linux
  • From: ardent_c_phil
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Guga
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Guga
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: 8086 Help
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Evenbit
• 8086 Help
  • From: anathema7g@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Randall, Any HLA Updates Planned?
  • From: [jongware]
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Do you like my new StrToInt with base 2..36?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: where to find man pages of assembly language instruction
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: where to find man pages of assembly language instruction
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Randall, Any HLA Updates Planned?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Dragontamer
• where to find man pages of assembly language instruction
  • From: DaVinci
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: o///annnabee
• Problem with stack pointer and SPIM
  • From: eksamor
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Do you like my new StrToInt with base 2..36?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Do you like my new StrToInt with base 2..36?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Randall, Any HLA Updates Planned?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: sevagK
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Randall, Any HLA Updates Planned?
  • From: Steve
• masm32.hlp, WIN32.HLP, masmlib.hlp
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Bill Marcum
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: The_Sage
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: o///annnabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: hutch--
• Multi-Statements Lines
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: \\\\\\o///annabee
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: \\\\\\o///annabee
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Sleep in uSec
  • From: john chung
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Betov
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: Betov
• Multiple Statements per Line
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone have some good links to writing a driver for Win2K?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Anyone have some good links to writing a driver for Win2K?
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: Sleep in uSec
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Sleep in uSec
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Sleep in uSec
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Sleep in uSec
  • From: christian . wallukat
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: greg . johnston
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Betov
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: john chung
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: ARM Thumb mode
  • From: James Harris
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: sevagK
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: johnzulu
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Chewy509
• Re: When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• win32 x86 ABI document
  • From: Vikas Kumar
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• When caveman Uhg invented fire
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Filesystems for embedded domain
  • From: karthikbg
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• ARM Thumb mode
  • From: Christian Christmann
• Re: Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: Betov
• why this assembly language is not good?
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Passing parameters & return value on the stack
  • From: Łukasz
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: ArarghMail604NOSPAM
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Any sample PCI code in x86/asm (non-os-specific)?
  • From: jonfaquit
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: [jongware]
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: taoberly
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: ArarghMail604NOSPAM
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Dunny
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: ldb
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: -\\o/-/annabee
• YA Win skeleton
  • From: Frank Kotler
• 16-bit disassembler options?
  • From: taoberly
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: ldb
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: \\\~\o/~///annabee
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Guga
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Donkey
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Guga
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: Eman
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: ArarghMail604NOSPAM
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Donkey
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: Betov
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why use assembly?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: xchg & lock question
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need speed! Byte-for-byte comparing ...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm and win32.hlp
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Johannes Kroll
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm and win32.hlp
  • From: Betov
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: Donkey
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: o//annabee
• Stop the search
  • From: Andy Kennedy
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: Evenbit
• assembler to assembler translation?
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: hutch--
• RosAsm and win32.hlp
  • From: JGCASEY
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Variation on a theme
  • From: Spam Killer
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: JGCASEY
• Taste of Nostalgia C=64 RULZ
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: africabushpilot
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Eman
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Fucking a Donkey
  • From: sevagK
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: James Daughtry
• Fucking a Donkey
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: Jim Carlock
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Donkey
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Guga
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Guga
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: Guga
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Guga
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: Betov
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: Betov
• SpooK strikes black, errr, back arrrr well at least something.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Eman
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Donkey
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Evenbit
• Re: SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: sevagK
• SpooK's New Moderator
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: greg . johnston
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Windows API question
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Windows API question
  • From: greg . johnston
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: ArarghMail603NOSPAM
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: greg . johnston
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Eman
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: john chung
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: James Daughtry
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Guga
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: The rats nets show
  • From: David Welch
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Betov
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: Betov
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b
• Re: Calling conventions
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: GDI can be fast!
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: RosAsm Bliss, and NASM Bliss
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: o//annabee
• Re: SpooK, its put up or shut up time.
  • From: Isaac Bosompem
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: Dragontamer
• Re: Formatting in assembly
  • From: ¬a\\/b

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)