Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
- From: pzgyuanf@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Apr 2006 04:05:05 -0700
The '3.3 Effective Addresses' section of Nasm doc really block me,
after reading 'Beginner question about arrays'
The 'Effective Addresses' in Nasm isn't that 'LEA-Load Effective
Address' in Intel 253666.pdf,
the former is the content of the memory, but the latter is memory
address (offset part).
So, I'm a beginner of ASM, appreciate your detail this catachrestial.
Frank Kotler, thank you for your explanation in 'Beginner question
about arrays' .
pipi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
- From: Julienne Walker
- Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
- Prev by Date: Re: Alphablending
- Next by Date: frame pointer
- Previous by thread: I'd like to learn asm...
- Next by thread: Re: Is it catachrestial as 'Effective Addresses' in NASM documentation?
- Index(es):
