Re: MASM Expert needed immediately

"f0dder" <f0dder_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:4478590e$0$67261
$157c6196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Zero interrest.

"it doesn't prove / it disproves my theory, so I'll pretend it doesn't
exist" - nice one there, Betov :)

? And what "theory" do you have ?

That Code level Optimization is usefull?

That SEE is usefull?

Yes, your example is without any interrest. As i always
said, if something is not fast enough, do not do it at
all, and it will take zero time.

Then, your number do not mean thing, the way they are,
but even though i saw this thread, i did not even took
a look and i will not, because this does not interrest
me, at all

Then, admitting the SSE routine would be really faster,
respecting all conditions that is, first, that the
normal way would also have been optimize to the max,
and that this speed-up would keep true on all SEE able
Processors, the point would still have many issues:

1) The FASM programmers who do such things are often
times wery good experts (One among other reason
why it does not have any interrest).

2) The old computers would never run this.

3) Take a Processor twice faster for the normal way,
and it will be twice faster.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.