Re: MASM Expert needed immediately

"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1148997669.468724.68820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I took a disassembly of RosAsm (done with IDA Pro 4.3) and ran it
through MASM.

Great, ass-hole. Just show us the result. This is quite
easy: You upload this somewhere, and you provide a link.
That way, we will learn how to rebuild a PE, with IDA.

Thanks in advance for the good laugh time.

:)

MASM compiled the output *much* faster than did RosAsm.
Now to be fair, this was *before* the last performance update for
RosAsm, but based on that benchmark, I'd suggest that MASM and RosAsm
are roughly equivalent, maybe with RosAsm having a slight edge, today.

One of the very typical swindling of our prefered ass-hole.

In case somebody could be tempted by giving any credit to
such a joke, it is useful to explain that flat naked Sources
are naturaly way faster to compile, given the suppression
of all of the Equates, Macros, and such HLL-able features.

The Macros alone represent usually half of a Compile time.


OTOH, on the basis of other benchmarks I've run, FASM is about 2.5x
faster than RosAsm. And this *is* comparing the latest version of
RosAsm against FASM.

You never had any competency for any benchmarking, the first
one of which is intellectual honnesty. As you never had any,
the lurkers will keep happy with doing self-compliations of
FASM-Fresh and of RosAsm, and with reading the Stats, that
say all there is to say.


Of course, expect Rene to start hollering about how incompetent I am
for creating benchmarks. After all, they disprove his claims.

No, ass-hole, they confirm them.


And when
you ask *him* for proof of his claims, he'll compare RosAsm compiling
itself against FASM compiling a completely different program. Yeah,
right; that's a competent benchmark.

Yes, ass-hole. FASM-Fresh and RosAsm are very similar sources,
doing similar things, similar ways. Now, as long as having under
the hand, two identical Sources is something that does not exist,
there is no way but comparing what can be compared.

Though, it is partialy true that FASM-Fresh Sources and RosAsm
Source are somewhat different, when talking of Speed comparison:

That is that RosAsm Source are evidently more HLL-Style than
FASM-Fresh ones. So the comparison is not completely fair...
at the advantage of... FASM, which does not need to spend as
much efforts on the Macros resolving, as RosAsm does.

:)

And, as for comparing with MASM... this does not deserve any
answer.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MASM Expert needed immediately
    ... RosAsm, but based on that benchmark, I'd suggest that MASM and RosAsm ... people don't consider FASM compiling FRESH to be comparable to RosAsm ... there is no way but comparing what can be compared. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA v2.x and / or LASM suggestion: Win32 Resources
    ... > I took the EQUATES.EQU file from the RosASM distribution, ... then assembled it using MASM. ... compiling dummy Files do not mean a thing, and that when, ... and that, when comparing to ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
    ... Said by the ass-hole who has nothing to show. ... RosAsm macro feature to MASM. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Betovs lies continue
    ... > Several months after taking a drubbing on how slow RosAsm is compared ... > the RosAsm board. ... that MASM was fater -...-), and it comes to be real pain ... And, mind you, when comparing to FASM Speed, this is ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: RosAsm is a broken pile of crap
    ... > Note that MASM requires a Declaration. ... also do Equates Declarations with RosAsm: ... Just don't try and take the RosAsm win32 equate file and try to ... Advanced programmers can't take the risk. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)