Re: MASM Expert needed immediately

Betov wrote:
"Julienne Walker" <happyfrosty@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1149001907.196464.125510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

My personal stance is that speed doesn't matter if the output is
correct and generated fast enough to keep users relatively happy.
However, when the author of a tool makes claims about the tool, it's
generally accepted practice to back those claims up with hard numbers.

It is: Read the Stats.

Since you brought it up, I've idly wondered what unit of measure you
use in those stats. It just gives a number with no mention (I couldn't
find any in B_U_Asm either. An index or search feature would be nice)
of what the number means.

<snip>
It's a little unreasonable to expect someone to take a few weeks out of
their busy schedule to learn RosAsm well enough to make accurate
observations about performance.

It does not seem to me expecting too much from any user
to be able to read the Stats, provided after each [F5].

So you don't mind someone using expensive features heavily (out of
ignorance of the tool) and then claiming that RosAsm is slow because
the stats say so? ;)

Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MASM Expert needed immediately
    ... It is: Read the Stats. ... in matter of Assemblers comparisons. ... and the time the dead file is outputed. ... and several Assemblers will be faster than RosAsm. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Optimization
    ... Compiling FASM-Fresh, with FASM, RosAsm with RosAsm, ... and by reading the stats. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)