Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: "Dave -Turner" <x@xxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:08:30 +0800
Is there much a need for re-assembly these days?
I mean, if its your source code then you can modify it at will - no need for
disassemble/reassemble etc, just compile ... on the other hand, if it's not
your program, then you're just reverse engineering it, in which case you may
have various needs to disassemble and analyse it, but is there much need to
then re-assemble it?
Dont get me wrong, I think Rosasm is probably as good as it gets so far in
terms of reassembly, but im just wondering how much demand there is for
reassembly?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- References:
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Prev by Date: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Next by Date: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Previous by thread: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Next by thread: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Index(es):