Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jun 2006 20:03:09 GMT
"Dave -Turner" <x@xxx> écrivait news:449aea79$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Is there much a need for re-assembly these days?...
Yes:
* There is a huge difference in between a disassembler that
can re-assemble, and one that cannot do it, that is that
the first one can be proven right (or wrong) with one click.
* The very first purpose of RosAsm Disassembler is about porting
C Demos to Assembly. What was consuming, say, one month, before,
can now be done in one or two days.
* One of the purpose of a Disassembler is in the educational
area. Learning from a faultive disassembly is not a very
good idea.
* Maybe you missed it, but this (one another) attempt of aggression
driven by Master Pdf, is based on a request from a CLAX participant,
and, as long as CLAX is moderated, he cannot post such attacks
against RosAsm, there. The question was from a guy wanting to
improve an old app he had developped (maybe a big lie, but well...)
... Such case may also exist, that is, you write an App, loose the
Source, and therefore, may be happy if a tool can do such a job,
for which, evidently, nobody (but Master Pdf, of course), would
ever recommand IDA.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Nicholas Sherlock
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- References:
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dave -Turner
- Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Prev by Date: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Next by Date: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Previous by thread: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Next by thread: Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|