Re: HLA
- From: "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 16:11:50 -0700
brennan.vincent@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Just a bit of a nitpick, though: Mr. Hyde, the argument in your last
post is fallacious. Of course it's true that no one has ever written a
program in MASM that couldn't be translated to HLA, this is true of any
compiled language. It's also true that no one has ever written a
program in, for example, C++ that couldn't be translated to HLA, and
I'm sure nobody calls C++ an assembly language.
Perhaps you misunderstood and I should clarify -- the translation I'm
talking about is line for line. That is, all your basic machine
instructions in all the other assemblers are present in HLA as well.
Therefore, a sequence of machine instructions in MASM (or any other x86
assembler) will translate directly into that same sequence of machine
instructions in HLA.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: HLA
- Next by Date: Re: HLA
- Previous by thread: Re: HLA
- Next by thread: Re: HLA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|