alt.lang.asm

Thread Index

Re: Strange occurrence with the source code
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: Strange occurrence with the source code
- From: Dave -Turner
Re: Strange occurrence with the source code
- From: Phil Bostock
Strange occurrence with the source code
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: TSS > CR3
- From: cmk128
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Vikas Kumar
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Vikas Kumar
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Betov
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Eman
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Betov
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Eman
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Paul Carter
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Betov
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: nasm/gdb woes
- From: geletine
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: PBrennick
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Eman
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: TSS > CR3
- From: japheth
Re: TSS > CR3
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Vikas Kumar
Re: TSS > CR3
- From: SpooK
TSS > CR3
- From: cmk128
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: rhyde
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: nasm/gdb woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: nasm/gdb woes
- From: T.M. Sommers
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: T.M. Sommers
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Eman
Can't think like a stack...
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Betov
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Phil Carmody
nasm/gdb woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Phil Carmody
cygwin/nasm woes
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Betov
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dragontamer
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: PBrennick
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Eman
interrupt through task gate ? ?
- From: cmk128
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dragontamer
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: santosh
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Dragontamer
Re: Delete a key
- From: Eman
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: santosh
Re: Delete a key
- From: Evenbit
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: T.M. Sommers
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: sevagK
Delete a key
- From: Andy Kennedy
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: geletine
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: rhyde
Re: HLA
- From: rhyde
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 now free
- From: Jim Carlock
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: HLA v1.82 is now available
- From: Betov
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: Betov
Re: HLA
- From: Betov
Re: HLA v1.82 is now available
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: rhyde
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 now free
- From: rhyde
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: rhyde
Re: HLA
- From: rhyde
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: rhyde
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: rhyde
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 now free
- From: Jim Carlock
Re: Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 now free
- From: Dave -Turner
Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 now free
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Eman
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: Betov
Re: HLA v1.82 is now available
- From: Betov
Re: HLA v1.84 is now available
- From: Betov
Re: HLA
- From: Betov
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: johnzulu
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: johnzulu
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: rhyde
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: SpooK
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: Donkey
Re: HLA v1.85 is available on Webster
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: what is wrong?
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Eman
Re: HLA v1.85 is available on Webster
- From: Johannes Kroll
Licencing of the proposed Win32ASM package
- From: hutch--
Re: what is wrong?
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: hutch--
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: what is wrong?
- From: anachronic_individual
Re: some curious code in NASM manual
- From: opexoc
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: what is wrong?
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: what is wrong?
- From: anachronic_individual
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Eman
Re: what is wrong?
- From: anachronic_individual
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Paul Carter
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: hutch--
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: japheth
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: �a\\/b
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: rhyde
Re: The Win32ASM Project
- From: japheth
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: what is wrong?
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: some curious code in NASM manual
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Paul Carter
Re: what is wrong?
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: Evenbit
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: �a\\/b
Re: Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: Frank Kotler
what is wrong?
- From: anachronic_individual
Re: Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
Re: Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: Eman
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Eman
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
some curious code in NASM manual
- From: opexoc
Re: section in NASM
- From: opexoc
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: geletine
Re: GAS gnu assembler
- From: geletine
Re: GAS gnu assembler
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: GAS gnu assembler
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: GAS gnu assembler
- From: bablu
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Smallest and fastest WinXP shutdown program
- From: Andy Kennedy
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Paul Carter
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Charles A. Crayne
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: addressing questions
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Bill Foster
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
addressing questions
- From: leon800219
The Win32ASM Project
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
beginner compile problem
- From: cozofdeath
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: come comment on LDTR
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
come comment on LDTR
- From: cmk128
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: santosh
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: section in NASM
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: HLA
- From: santosh
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: opexoc
Re: HLA
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: hutch--
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: Assembly in MASM32
- From: f0dder
section in NASM
- From: opexoc
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: opexoc
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Jim Carlock
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: opexoc
Re: GAS gnu assembler
- From: geletine
Re: Assembly in MASM32
- From: hutch--
GAS gnu assembler
- From: bablu
Re: Assembly in MASM32
- From: Dave -Turner
Assembly in MASM32
- From: bablu
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: printf function
- From: �a\\/b
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: printf function
- From: johnzulu
Re: NASM dead?
- From: johnzulu
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Jim Carlock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: ArarghMail606NOSPAM
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: printf function
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: printf function
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Jim Carlock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
printf function
- From: �a\\/b
Re: this is not ok
- From: �a\\/b
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Carmody
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: �a\\/b
Re: Conditional Directives and Constants?
- From: ArarghMail606NOSPAM
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: ArarghMail606NOSPAM
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: Conditional Directives and Constants?
- From: Evenbit
Re: Conditional Directives and Constants?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Conditional Directives and Constants?
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: 16/32 processor operating mode
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
16/32 processor operating mode
- From: opexoc
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Evenbit
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: SpooK
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: rhyde
Re: HLA
- From: Titus
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: f0dder
Re: File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: santosh
File I/O using NASM in 32-bit mode
- From: Phil Bostock
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: santosh
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: santosh
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: Orange
Re: What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: santosh
What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: traapons
What to start with MASM NASM FASM
- From: traapons
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: opexoc
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: opexoc
Re: HLA
- From: santosh
Re: HLA
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: Equivalence of assemblers
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: _fillbuf
- From: santosh
Re: _fillbuf
- From: rhyde
Re: _fillbuf
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Equivalence of assemblers
- From: rhyde
Re: HLA
- From: rhyde
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: _fillbuf
- From: santosh
Re: _fillbuf
- From: Julienne Walker
Re: _fillbuf
- From: santosh
Re: _fillbuf
- From: f0dder
Re: _fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: opexoc
_fillbuf
- From: �a\\/b
Win x64 Questions
- From: Chewy509
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: COM/EXE header problem
- From: Donkey
Re: WinExplorer
- From: f0dder
Re: WinExplorer
- From: Donkey
Re: Library Design, f0dder's nightmare.
- From: f0dder
Re: WinExplorer
- From: Donkey
COM/EXE header problem
- From: opexoc
Re: debug.exe manual
- From: Frank Kotler
debug.exe manual
- From: opexoc
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: santosh
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: santosh
Re: Equivalence of assemblers
- From: brennan . vincent
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: opexoc
Re: Equivalence of assemblers
- From: santosh
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: santosh
Equivalence of assemblers
- From: brennan . vincent
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: opexoc
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: santosh
Re: Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: opexoc
Why my NASM don't provide coff format ?
- From: opexoc
Re: HLA
- From: santosh
Re: WinExplorer
- From: hutch--
Re: HLA
- From: T.M. Sommers
Re: HLA
- From: T.M. Sommers
Re: HLA
- From: Rod Pemberton
WinExplorer
- From: Donkey
Re: HLA
- From: santosh
Re: HLA
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: HLA
- From: Dunny
Re: Replace polling with interrupt
- From: swathimathur80
Re: HLA
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: HLA
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: Replace polling with interrupt
- From: Rod Pemberton
Re: HLA
- From: brennan . vincent
Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
- From: sevagK
Re: Replace polling with interrupt
- From: Frank Kotler
Re: Replace polling with interrupt
- From: Charles A. Crayne