Re: HLA v1.86 is now available

Howard Kaikow wrote:
"Charles A. Crayne" <ccrayne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20060722021333.66522270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 21 Jul 2006 08:18:55 GMT
Betov <betov@xxxxxxx> wrote:

:Can you explain to me the reason why, as a CLAX moderator,
:you tolerate insanities like:
[re-inserted]
"From a features point of view, HLA is one of the most
powerful assemblers ever written. It's macro and
"compile-time language" facilities far exceed those found
in other assemblers"

The fact that I accept a post for clax86, means only that the post meets
the minimum requirements for posting, and does not imply that I either
agree or disagree with the contents.


You've got to be kidding.

I certainly hope not!

By any reasonable guidelines, such posts would be deleted and the poster
would perhaps be banned.

On what grounds?

Assuming the post were for some reason objectionable, why would the poster be "banned"? Are you suggesting that a group should be moderated based on personalities?

Of course, the felony is compounded by others acknowledging the posts by
replying.

Pointing out to Randy that his tarball is gefukt is a *felony*???

Heck, ignore them!

You have that option. If your browser doesn't have an "ignore" button, I find "next" works pretty well.

When necessary, communicate, or take legal action, offline.

Right... let's take legal action for these "lies and swindlings"!!!

Where you from, dude? They got freedom of speech there? If so, do you think it should be eliminated?

I sure am glad Chuck is the moderator of clax, not you!

Best,
Frank
.