Re: HLA v1.86 is now available

Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:O6GdnX-
124ib4F_ZnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:

Betov wrote:
Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:nNOdnX3Gi8AawV_ZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:


By any reasonable guidelines, such posts would be deleted and the

poster

would perhaps be banned.

On what grounds?

Assuming the post were for some reason objectionable, why would the
poster be "banned"? Are you suggesting that a group should be
moderated
based on personalities?


No group should ever be moderated.

Tell it to the folks who *voted* to *create* the moderated group, in
response to comp.lang.asm becoming... well, like this newsgroup is. You
like an unmoderated group, comp.lang.asm still exists. (just for the
hell of it, I'll crosspost this there! Ain't I bad? :)

I did not even know that a group called "comp.lang.asm"
existed... I will search tomorrow...


FWIW, in retrospect, I think it was a mistake to create the moderated
group (I didn't vote either way - too new). What we *should* have done
is what we should do here - ignore the off-topic or "flameful" posts.
You got a post like *this* one in mind? Don't post it! "Discipline"!
But
no, "lest the newbies be misled" we had to go on and on. I *should*
delete this, rather than hit "send"... I guess I'd rather be "part of
the problem".

So said, once a group
_is_ moderated, yes, individuals like Randall Hyde should
be ban on the base of their personality:

This individual never did anything in his life but rephrasing
others' works and selling himself, at the expend of beginners,

In my observation, this is "factually incorrect". In other words, a
lie.

Show us what the swindler _did_.


We can go back to AoA16 and the UCR Standard Library, if you like

Joking me???!!!...

AoA16 always was an insane Blabla without any information
that would not have been copied from others works. Same
for the so called "Standard Library". Again, show us one
single innovation, that would have been produced by this
individual.


, or we
can stick to Randy's more recent contributions...

???!!!... Which is?...


Exactly which part is
"rephrasing others' works", and exactly which work is it rephrasing?
This is a very serious accusation! Can you back it up?

Easily. There is not one sigle word of this swindler
that would not be rephrased from materials taken from
others' works. The most extreeme case of indecency was
recently reached with the famous Tutorial about Win32
programming, whereas this nerd waited patiently that
all of the Assembly pioneers had done all of the job,
for selling himself on the thema, without having EVER
contributed to one single poor Demo, during all of the
Rebirth years, as everybody knows.


...

(And BTW, where's Wannabee? Do you know what happened to him?

Half has actually very serious real life problems.


Some supporter of freedom of speech you turn out to be! With anarchists
like this, who needs fascists?

Given the actual state and direction of the humanity,
i am afraid that a US citizen, like you, will no more
have any occasion for ever learning what anarchia and
fascism are. Too late, unfortunately.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >



.