Re: Question about jumps
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 23:00:42 +0300
Herbert Kleebauer <klee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Evenbit wrote:
If you truely have faith that Lindela is of value to the programming
community, why don't you submit it to kernel.org, linux.org, ibiblio,
etc.?? I see that NASM is present in nearly all of those places (with
virtually no other assemblers to keep it company) and this is probably
the cause of it being available with practically every Linux distro.
Food for thought, anyway.
Unix and C belongs together (or Linux and GCC). Give me one reason why
somebody would want to write an application for Unix in assembler. And if
you need some parts of the code in assembler, then the only logical way
is, to use GAS. There is no need for any other assembler in Linux for
writing software.
Nonsense. If one uses Linux, dislikes GAS, likes NASM, and
desires ones inner loops to run faster than the C compiler
can make them, then there /is/ a need for another assembler
in linux, namely NASM. It's the demand that defines the
need, not the supply.
clear and logical 68k syntax.
The moon never sets on planet Herby, I see.
Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.
.
- References:
- Question about jumps
- From: Markus Pitha
- Re: Question about jumps
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Question about jumps
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Question about jumps
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Question about jumps
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Question about jumps
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Question about jumps
- Prev by Date: Re: Displaying string
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about jumps
- Next by thread: Re: Question about jumps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|