Re: Why HLL and not C?

Andreas Kochenburger <akk@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:2jmdg2hj34gst8lvrq0ldt98rblrosm1o7@xxxxxxx:

I meant HL Library, not HL Language. Within asm in C you can call C
functions easily, also from the C library.
AFAIK assembler HLLs provide more or less the same functionality as a
C library.

Paul Carter recommends in his PC Assembly Tutorial book to go the C
way. He seems convincing.

I am only wondering wether there are strong arguments for using
assembler HLLs despite his advice.

What do you call "assembler HLLs", exactly? Are you meaning:

* "HLL-able Assemblers", or

* "Inline-Assembly-able HLLs"?

It seems to me that you are asking the question about what
is the difference in between these two... but i am not sure
of it... and whatever the case... why on earth were you talking
of the HLA ***, in your original post? Were you meaning,
litteraly "High Level Assembly" (without relationship to "HLA")?


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >





.