Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Oct 2006 07:04:54 GMT
"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1161555308.097141.82840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
That's why, for example, designing an *interactive* disassembler is
always a good idea. We know that a computer program cannot
automatically disassemble any computer program, but thus far, human
beings have been pretty good at solving this problem, correctly
disassembling lots of programs that automated software has failed on.
You are very god at blablating, clown, but i am still
waiting for you to provide any demonstration of any
significative real Application, that you would have
disassembled and reassembled with your prefered toys.
Covering challenges under tons of bullshits does not
do it, clown.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- A modern view of the halting problem
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- A modern view of the halting problem
- Prev by Date: Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- Next by Date: Re: TMA Assembler?
- Previous by thread: Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- Next by thread: Re: A modern view of the halting problem
- Index(es):