Re: To RISC or not to RISC


Betov wrote:
"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1161988847.879571.178900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Probably the reason why, hafter having build your usurpated
reputation in the DOS times, you waited MANY YEARS, for the
couple of pioneers to do all of the hard work, before jumping
on the band wagon, clown.

????
I started moving my stuff to 32-bit code in 1995 and made the decision
to switch over to Win32 in 1996. What are you talking about? The
"pioneers" you keep talking about started their work at about the same
time, or later. Again, what are you talking about?

Now granted, writing over 100,000 lines of code doesn't happen
overnight. So it did take three years to actually implement HLA under
Win32, but that's not the same thing as "waiting" many years before
jumping on the "band wagon" as you claim. Sorry, but your revisionist
history just doesn't cut it.

And do keep in mind, this was back in the days you were still pounding
houses together for a living. So if anyone was "jumping on the
bandwagon" after the "pioneers" did all the work, I'm afraid it was
you, not me.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Asm For Nerds
    ... "Windows assembly programming pioneers". ... for own Win32 programs. ... Bottom line, Rene, is that most people just read the documentation ... does absolutely not apply to the Multi-Purpose Assemblers, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA v1.86 is now available
    ... Iczelion tutorials. ... book about Win32 Assembly Programming ... these great pioneers of yours teach how to make calls to the Win32 API, ... they do *not* teach assembly language programming. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)