Re: To RISC or not to RISC

From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
Date: 29 Oct 2006 01:39:22 -0800

Back to RISC:

When I am programming ASM on ARM, i have more "appropriate" feel. On
ARM, your ASM code is much faster compared to C-produced code, than on
x86.

I love possibility to condition every instruction.

how long are you programming ARM? What OS?

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: KJH
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: Betov
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: Betov

References:
- To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: KJH
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: Betov
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: Betov
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: To RISC or not to RISC
  - From: Betov

Prev by Date: Re: A modern view of the halting problem
Next by Date: Re: To RISC or not to RISC
Previous by thread: Re: To RISC or not to RISC
Next by thread: Re: To RISC or not to RISC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: To RISC or not to RISC
... When I am programming ASM on ARM, ... ARM, your ASM code is much faster compared to C-produced code, than on ... x86. ...
(alt.lang.asm)
Re: To RISC or not to RISC
... When I am programming ASM on ARM, ... ARM, your ASM code is much faster compared to C-produced code, than on ... x86 Assembly Applications. ...
(alt.lang.asm)
Re: assembly in Platform Builder
... inline assembly is not allowed in ARM ... Are you using the SDF? ... > Well, using C and the _asm keyword, I can include x86 assembly code ... > Try it with ARM asm code. ...
(microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder)