Re: HLA and embedded controllers

vid512@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Actually, I am doing that right now. The HLA stdlib v2.x will probably
start appearing within a month or so. There are a couple of reasons
I'm rewriting the library (though this has nothihng to do with
supporting microcontrollers); in order of priority:

wow, i've got competition ;)
i am writing FASMLIB, std library for FASM, and want to make it
seriously. Yours library is only one looking like real std library i've
seen yet. unfortunately it is limited to HLA-only by design, thus
unusable for ASM programmers.

How so? I don't have a "working" example for Nasm, but I've got a "proof of concept" example. I don't see any insurmountable problems. They tell me Fasm has "better" macros than Nasm... should be a piece of cake! (I thought it *had* been done for Fasm, in fact.)

Best,
Frank
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HLA and embedded controllers
    ... I'm rewriting the library (though this has nothihng to do with ... supporting microcontrollers); in order of priority: ... porting it to FASM is using the HLA stdlib's 'put' macros since FASM ... And have the macro sort out the correct routines to call. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Definitions - What are yours?
    ... *something* about the FASM code, ... at working under DOS (as VID explained to you, ... if rewriting part of FASM in order to take full ... the more sane asm coders here will use automated branch ...
    (alt.lang.asm)