Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2006 07:39:32 GMT
"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1162260698.949358.312800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
That's why I laugh when people start talking about how "HLA is
just a high-level language" and the "proof" of this they give is
stdout.put( "Hello world" nl );
The stdout.put macro invocation isn't a part of the HLA language at
all.
No, this is not "the proof" of it. There is not one proof,
that your HLL Pre-Parser is not an Assembler, but as many
prooves, as for any HLL:
* There is no Assembler inside.
* All of the Programming methods you are pushing on young
heads, are the HLLs ones.
* To know of what your HLL Pre-Parser outputs, there is no
way but to... disassemble what it finaly produce by passing
down to an Assembler written by somebody else.
* Your HLL Pre-Parser is designed to hide the Code.
So, there are so many means, out of the absurd Syntax, for
showing that an HLL Pre-Parser is not any Assembler, that
this absurd Syntax is just an unsignificant detail.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- HLA and embedded controllers
- From: johnzulu
- Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- HLA and embedded controllers
- Prev by Date: Re: To RISC or not to RISC
- Next by Date: Re: HLA is for advanced assembly programmers
- Previous by thread: Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- Next by thread: Re: HLA and embedded controllers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|