Re: One another trick
- From: "T.M. Sommers" <tms@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:30:08 -0500
KiLVaiDeN wrote:
Betov wrote:
It is about breacking the Treads flows, in order to make them
as difficult as possible to understand. I have therefore no
choice but to NOT answer to all of those insanities posts
starting with "///", and to let him exclude himself from these
debates, that he could never win. Personaly, i will follow up
on his recommandation saying that all such Posts should not be
read.
I personally think that this thread breaking attempt is really useless
and confusing.
It breaks also in Google groups, and I think it will break on most news
readers, as long as they base their grouping on the subject of the
post, and have no other way to group items.
In Google groups, they can still be grouped, because they use
"references" as shown below ( a post source from one of those thread
breaking message ) :
[snip]
So basically it means that only Google Groups is going to thread them
correctly
Any half-way decent newsreader will use the Reference headers to do its threading. Mozilla certainly does; changes of subject lines (which happen often as threads drift) do not break threads.
--
Thomas M. Sommers -- tms@xxxxxx -- AB2SB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- ///Re: One another trick
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: One another trick
- From: KiLVaiDeN
- ///Re: One another trick
- References:
- One another trick
- From: Betov
- Re: One another trick
- From: KiLVaiDeN
- One another trick
- Prev by Date: Re: Explanation of a swindling
- Next by Date: Re: Explanation of a swindling
- Previous by thread: Re: One another trick
- Next by thread: Re: One another trick
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|