Re: One another trick

KiLVaiDeN wrote:
T.M. Sommers wrote:

It is considered common courtesy to quote some of the article
being replied to, so that people have some idea of what you are
talking about.

You seem to know a lot about courtesy, yet you don't seem to agree to
the fact that manipulating original topic's subject is all but
courteous.

The subject line should reflect what is in the article. If the thread drifts, and the content of the article differs substantially from the original subject, the subject line should be changed.

On your other post you say that "it's of common use to change topic's
subject, when the content of the post differs a lot with the original
post", but I don't agree; Then why post on the same topic, if it's not
to talk about the original post ?

Threads drift. That is a fact of life. Live with it..

You changed your title to "newsreaders" but as far as I know, the
original post was exactly talking about that.

It was a demonstration, as I explained. Further, the subject line "One another trick" is meaningless.

--
Thomas M. Sommers -- tms@xxxxxx -- AB2SB

.