///Re: One another trick


Betov wrote:
"KiLVaiDeN" <kilvaiden@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1162564567.973487.324280
@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

T.M. Sommers wrote:
...

I have experienced recently, that it is 100% useless
to have any discussion with Sommers.

I.e., he doesn't buy you line of crap any more than anyone else around
here.

After i had
posted the explanations about the famous "RosAsm can't
compile it's own Win32 Equates List" swindling, _at
his request_... he never understood one single word
of it, dispiting my repeated answers...

Imagine that. He asks for clarification and you post the exact same
thing again. And you wonder why he continued to ask for clarification.

Problem is, Rene, he was on to you. He saw through your smoke screen
and kept asking you what a "duplicate symbol error" had to do with the
problem. Absolutely nothing, of course. But you kept raising that red
herring in order to deflect attention away from the real problem. I
notice you didn't respond when he and I both provided links to the code
in question (the English dictionary version of the program, which
certainly had no duplicate symbols). The problem is, no matter how many
times you throw up the smoke screen, you can't fool someone who has an
inkling of what's going on. Maybe KilVaiDen is impressed by your logic,
but don't expect other people to be. They can smell rotten fish when
you toss it at them.


Considering that Randall Hyde, whose IQ is below 80,

Yet, for some reason, I'm able to find all of these defects in your
code, that have been verified by others, that you seem to think aren't
there. And I'm not the one trying to claim that a symbol table overflow
error was produced by having duplicate symbols in the source file
(which it didn't). Perhaps you're relying on everyone's IQ around here
to be substantially lower than 80 so they'll all believe your nonsense?
Let me clue you in, people around here are a lot smarter than you give
them credit for.

understood it at first read, this is an impressive
demonstration about the intelligency level of the
Randall Hyde victims. And as long as intelligency
and intellectual honesty are used to walk hand in
hand...

You mean that they can see through your smoke screens and don't buy
your lies?
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.