Re: WhichAsm.html
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Nov 2006 08:04:05 GMT
"f0dder" <f0dder.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:45639e50$0$176$157c6196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
vid512@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
his site is one with highest google ratio on subject, and lying about
competitions assemblers is not something i consider fair.
Keep in mind that there's a difference between not prioritizing
updating a page like that, and outright lying - lying is something
that's done intentionally.
You are this kind of guy, Fooder, who, even with his
nose pushed into the ***, would keep claiming that
this is chocolate.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WhichAsm.html
- From: f0dder
- Re: WhichAsm.html
- References:
- WhichAsm.html
- From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WhichAsm.html
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: WhichAsm.html
- From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: WhichAsm.html
- From: f0dder
- WhichAsm.html
- Prev by Date: Re: raghu protected mode
- Next by Date: Re: Rid of Multi-Pass
- Previous by thread: Re: WhichAsm.html
- Next by thread: Re: WhichAsm.html
- Index(es):