Re: Is je more effective than jg


<leon800219@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164592812.095934.170610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all:

I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, if so why?

The statement:
for(i=0;i<=10;++i)
{
}
seems slower than:
for(i=0;i!=10;++i)
{
}
?


In the subject of this message you ask about JE. In the body of this
message you ask about JBE. So I am confused. Anyway the question is what
is "effective". JE,JBE, and JG are three different instructions that do
different things. So is addition more "effective" than multiplication or
subtraction? Ratch


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is je more effective than jg
    ... I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, ... flags simultaneously, then JG will be the slower instruction. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Is je more effective than jg
    ... I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, ... seems slower than: ... So the real difference is: ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Is je more effective than jg
    ... I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, ... seems slower than: ... Have you considered that the first loop is executed 11 times and the ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Is je more effective than jg
    ... I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, ... seems slower than: ... JE,JBE, and JG are three different instructions that do ... Sorry for confusion my question is on JE and JG, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Is je more effective than jg
    ... I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, ... seems slower than: ... Have you considered that the first loop is executed 11 times and the ...
    (alt.lang.asm)