Re: Is je more effective than jg
- From: leon800219@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Nov 2006 23:25:35 -0800
"robertwess...@xxxxxxxxx 写道:
"
leon800219@xxxxxxxxx wrote:Oops, Sorry I did't noticed that. It should be
Hi all:
I wonder is jne more effective than jbe, if so why?
The statement:
for(i=0;i<=10;++i)
{
}
seems slower than:
for(i=0;i!=10;++i)
{
}
Have you considered that the first loop is executed 11 times and the
second 10?
for(i=0;i<=9;++i)
{
}
seems slower than:
for(i=0;i!=10;++i)
{
}
Sorry for the distraction.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is je more effective than jg
- From: robertwessel2
- Re: Is je more effective than jg
- References:
- Is je more effective than jg
- From: leon800219
- Re: Is je more effective than jg
- From: robertwessel2
- Is je more effective than jg
- Prev by Date: Re: Is je more effective than jg
- Next by Date: Re: Time this code, please!
- Previous by thread: Re: Is je more effective than jg
- Next by thread: Re: Is je more effective than jg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|