Re: /// Back to assembly language is productive


On Dec 29, 9:27 am, //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <"WINOS IS ***."> wrote:
If he chooses a good
tool like RosAsm, he will discover that he spent 10 years at combatting
codebuilding for a language way more complicated and much less efficient
then asm. That he spent 10 years at cocksucking.

So are you saying that RosAsm is a good tool for cocksuckers?

:) No, ernobe. Its good for discovering.

Assuming that the distance that separates HLLs is greater than what
separates assembly languages, and that you are talking about the
discovery of the value of assembly language vs. HLLs, then you ought to
be prepared to introduce assembly to beginners differently than HLLs
do. If beginners to RosAsm get the same "Did you see how easy I did
that, that's the power of it" treatment that you get from teachers of
C, then how is a beginner to know what to choose? I mean, nothing
about RosAsm will make any sense if they have to learn a HLL in order
to understand RosAsm!

.

Quantcast