Re: /// Back to assembly language is productive



On Dec 29, 5:36 pm, //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <"WINOS IS ***."> wrote:
Good observation.

I have no answer. I only know that at the time I was ready for RosAsm
(Spasm) I was genuinly feed up with having to examine every piece of code
in my Delphi libraries, in order to rewrite them to suit my needs. It
became such a work that there was no longer any possible argument against
learning asm.

I hope that someone like me, would skip this step, and proceed directly to
asm, where their full creative potential will be immediatly respected, and
their creative will, immidiatly visible in everything they code, long
before they get tired of programming. Tired of having to face all theese
invisible walls of needless ignorance, hidden in their HLLs.

I think that if all computer programmers knew asm and no HLLs, then
their overall productivity would not change, only that instead of
compiling programs for different platforms with a click and spending
years in program development, they would spend years adapting asm
programs to different platforms and only a click in program development
time with asm. The difference would be that in the latter alternative
the programmers would be more open to suggestions from non-programmers,
since the adaptation to a different platform requires more than just a
click.

.

Quantcast