Re: Back to assembly language is productive

Betov wrote:
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1167412906.405093.78090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

you are in a very small group of people -- those who only know
assembly language and think it's the most productive without actually
having bothered to learn anything else.

? And what makes you believe that i never learned any
HLL in between 1968 and 2006, clown ?


good programmers have a lot more tools in their
toolchest than a hammer (assembly language) and know when to use the
appropriate tool for the current job (application).

Clown, when a guy like Herbert says this to me, i might
give him, at least, the credit, that he really believes
what he says, but, having you parroting his sentences is
shocking:

Learn a bit of Assembly, first, clown, and during that
time, please, shut up your *** box.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >





The real problem is how lazy humans are, just like speakers use less and
less words and evolution tends to simplify grammars, programmers have
less and less knowledge of the bare stuffs and they tend to use tools
that do the job for them.

Most of the programmers believe that productivity is the real point and
this lead to buggy mainstream softwares and a constant flow of updates.
Yet I know assembly language development is a really "brain smasher" and
"coffee consuming" process I know that assembly programmers are much
more aware of bugs and pitfalls.

I don't care about having 52 releases a year, my only concern is one
fully working release so that I can archieve some productivity. HLLers
cannot fully understand that because debugging is just a matter of click
for most of them.
.

Quantcast