Re: Download counts of assemblers.

På Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:54:17 +0100, skrev Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

//\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free" wrote:

...
This is the diffrence between HLA and asm. HLA has a library that is written in C.

Really? That fuckin' lying swindler Randy Hyde claims it's not!

Hmmm... Jeez, looking at the HLA Standard Library code, it sure doesn't *look* like C!


Maybe Randy's not the lying swindler here? Or are you really that ignorant? It's one or the other, Wannabee!

When it comes to HLA, I thank my ignorance every day.

I have heard that HLA is written in C, bison, and flex. What are you saying, that he wrote HLA in C, but the HLA library in (what)?

Second. If the library is really written in (what?), and it "sure as hell doesnt look like C", then why does he offer his user something less then this, and something diffrent then the tool he used to produce those libs. If those libs are good, the tool used to make them must also be good, or what?

Third, HLA is much to uninteressting and Randall Hyde is much to critical of asm in general for me to bother to find out anything more about it. He became an idiot to me with his recursive parantesis, and pascal+c syntax bastardcrash. Plus his many insane attacks on RosAsm, for no reason at all. RosAsm beeing the best assembler ever created on windows, and possibly at all plattforms.

Forth, HLA is dog slow.

Fifth. I have seen some of the code for his "roll over and die" stuff. This is the worst possible gay code I have ever dirtied my mind trying to make head and tails from.

So even without knowing what goes into the standardlibrary, this is way more info than I need to know that HLA belongs in the recyclebin.

I he wants me to cuddle his intellect, he better try the straight and narrow for a while, and start posting that "yes, RosAsm really is an awsome assembler, and I have much to learn from Betov".

Because those would be the facts. Assuming you could all be real people, I suggest stopping the protective attitude and start to study why and how theres no applications written with your assemblers, and not clinging to the strange idea that it is because you have intelligent users. Yes. HLA probably has the most intelligent "users" as it has none. Because, intelligent users would not use such patetic tool.

Try stop shitting in your own nest!


Best,
Frank
.