Re: ///Wannabee Rants


//\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Free" wrote:
A good question would maybe be: How _could_ we "prove" it. How many apps
must be programmed in asm, by a few asm programmers in order to prove to
HLLers that asm is the better choise, also from a productivity perspective?


You can write a million programs and still not prove anything. What
needs to be done is to prove that assembly is a commercially viable
option.

-sevag.k
www.geocities.com/kahlinor

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why There are no Asm Apps
    ... > superiority of an assembly app over a Java app in terms of speed. ... But it fully doable in asm as well as HLL, ... remember that M$ programmers are on the avarage 100 times worse than most ... and even more likely to happen then with many other assemblers. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Computer time -> Developer time -> User time?
    ... > del elli.com ... fulltime productions by mediocre programmers is simply wrong. ... Asm would be the best language for any form of ... Your maintainance claim is completly wrong. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: a common belief or a wrong C[++] compiler?
    ... ASM isn't the language to make portable source for different CPUs. ... But it will depend on the programmers taste, ... which instructions may be seen useful or not. ... Yeah, funny. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: "We Never Use Assembly Language"
    ... I'm only pointing out what well-respected programmers are ... saying about assembly language. ... But it turns out, everytime I really try to do something in asm, it is ten times more fun, and it takes about the time it would have taken to learn the API ways of doing it. ... Why would I spend so much time working on an assembler? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Hey Mr. Hyde!
    ... |> And one more generation of programmers who have no idea ... |> ASM is the proper language for man-machine-link programming, ... | You read Randy's 16-bit AoA, wolfgang? ... Randy teaches programming the way he think it's best. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)