Re: ///Wannabee Rants

På Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:26:56 +0100, skrev Bodhi <bodhi@xxxxxxxxxx>:

//\\o//\\annabee <Free" wrote:
På Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:34:14 +0100, skrev Bodhi <bodhi@xxxxxxxxxx>:


But I am enjoying this, watching you be an idiot. ;)
And how are this "I" you are speaking of ?






YES.


I think we can have a more full answer below.
This is what you posted on alt.lang.asm since

5. of january 2007



1/05/2007

I can sense in reading your posts that you are very pablum, probably anal, and

extremely predictable. More than likely, I can tell you what you are thinking

even now, while reading this.

1/05/2007 22:33

Randy,

I know you already know this, but just for the record, Rene is even more

predictable than Flysuck Buying.
He hasn't written anything new or original in the 3+ years I've been lurking

here. He's like a broken record.

1/05/2007 22:29
But watching as Flysuck get all flustered and discomposed is the amusing part,

for me, that I mentioned in my first post.

What I don't quite understand is why he would post here and at

alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi with the same question. That's a bit confusing to

me. Unless,...it's like you said: All he's really interested in is the

attention.

1/06/2007 21:32

Allow me to inform you of this fact, there is no contest.
And, while I'm at it, you're the only one that looks like a fool.


1/07/2007 00:49
But, why would I claim anything about Delphi? I know nothing about it. And

what does having "a bitset instruction" in Delphi have to do with anything

I've said to you prior to this?

You're losing it, Flysuck. And you know it, too.

1/07/2007 01:54
Yes, whatever "case" you're referring to, it is closed. But only because I

don't want to embarrass you in front of everybody anymore. Having a debate, or

even a discussion with you is non-challenging. You are too easily defeatable.

1/07/2007 02:06
Like I said, "You are too easily defeatable."
Now go take your medication.

1/07/2007 02:40
Alright, I'm starting to get a guilty conscience here. The kind one gets when

they find out they've been taunting a "mentally-challenged" person.

I'll really start to feel that way, if you respond to this by saying that I'm

"mentally-challenged".

The proverbial ball is now in your court, Mr. Flying.

1/07/2007 05:15
Well, all I can do now is feel sorry for you.

I hope you don't think I was making fun of you. I honestly thought you were a

normal person with an "attitude problem", and that you would calm down after

talking it over with other people here in Usenet. But I see now that that's

not the way it is.

You need help, badly. And I sincerely hope you find it.

1/07/2007 18:18:08
From a long-time lurker here at alt.lang.asm:
It's the way Rene says what he says, the manner in which he presents

himself, that tells me whatever it is he has to say, it can't possibly be

true. Nobody speaking the truth says it repeatedly, over and over, ad nauseam,

in that fashion.

1/07/2007 21:23:26
No. That's not what I said at all. I would try explaining it to
you, but there's not a doubt in my mind that you would not be able
to understand it.

....

In my opinion, you're living a pathetic and empty life.
And it's the only one you'll ever have. What a waste.

1/08/2007 01:38:48
And by trying to shift the focus of attention over onto me,
you once again prove that I'm right, and that you're not
able to understand how darkened your mind has become, and
how blinded you are by your constant barrage of lies.

But I'm sure you'll never understand it enough to begin
perceiving how far down you have sunk.

For all The Lord of the Rings fans that may be reading this,
doesn't Rene remind you of Gollum ? And how obsessed he became
with getting his "precious" back, that he believed had been
stolen from him.

Only this is true life tragedy.

1/08/2007 03:56:28
It's amazing to see how some people seem to grow a new set of testicles while

here in Usenet.

In my opinion, you have no idea what you're talking about. You're just
shooting off at the mouth, using words that sound infantile and full of

bull***. You're living another empty life, just like your, let's call him

your "significant other".


1/08/2007 06:00:27
What is it with all you Rosasm addicts? Are you all dumb as dirt? You seem to

think I'm talking about Rosasm. I'm NOT, you dumbass. I'm talking about Rene's

manner of repeating the same thing over and over and over, sometimes verbatim,

what he wrote sometimes just a few minutes before. *THAT* is a sure sign the

boy is missing a few brain cells. Don't you get that?

Don't answer that. I already know you don't.

1/09/2007 06:00:27
You go *** yourself, ass-wipe.

1/09/2007 23:20:55
Up yours.

1/10/2007 18:04:00
And yet, in your ardent endeavor at correcting and rectifying everyone's

"contradictions" of Usenet, you conveniently overlooked (or left out, on

purpose) the last post that I made to Wannabee, which had been posted well

over *TEN* HOURS BEFORE !!

I'll leave it up to you to go find it, and (re-)read it to your own bitter

shame.

I detect a touch of arrogance and condescension in your posts, that maybe you

feel as if you have been "sent" to correct the misguided offenses of others.

Now, let us peruse just a few of your more recent posts, and, perchance,

perceive a pattern starting to develop here, shall we?


For example, you wrote:
"Better go and troll in some other group. Your opinions on RosAsm and HLA

aren't of any consequence to anyone here."

and again:
"It's getting near the point that your "recommendations" are not worth their

value in electrons."

and, as the stereotypical netcop, you wrote this:
"You're the stereotypical troll, and as such, the best place for you is the

bit-bucket, where you can play around with others of your kind."

I especially found this post of yours to be more than a little disturbing:
"At least Betov has suffered a decade of disappointment; what're your reasons

for foul-mouthing others?"

I'm interested in knowing if you are saying that "foul-mouthing others" *is*

excusable, as long as there is a good enough reason for doing so?


1/16/2007 00:41:57
You're not fooling anyone. You're not even a real full-time clown. All you are

is an amateur part-time clown.

1/16/2007 01:28:11
You may enjoy wasting your own time, but you're not going to waste my time.


1/16/2007 03:19:59
The reason has been explained to you already. You are incapable of coming to

terms with it.

You English is still unacceptable.

And you're still nothing but an amateur clown.

But, do keep playing your mind-games. I enjoy watching you make a fool of

yourself.

1/16/2007 22:27:59
I don't think you're as big of an idiot as you would like to be, and I'll tell

you why.

You're on borrowed time now, and your days are numbered. It's just a matter of

time before you, and maybe one or two other people, are the only ones that use

your (worthless) product.

With each passing day, you get closer and closer to being extinct, to being a

hasbeen, or, in Wannabee's case, to being a "Neverwillbee".

And you know it. You see it happening. You know there's nothing you can do to

stop it from happening. I can tell you know it, just from the words and

phrases that you, and Wannabee use when posting here.

And now, everyone here knows you're running scared. Everyone knows there is

nothing you can do to stop from going in the direction you're heading, and

turn things around, and start heading back in the opposite direction.

So, because you already know this, I really don't think you are as big of an

idiot as you pretend to be, or as you would like to be.


1/16/2007 22:34:14
You're wasting your time again.

You should be trying to get out of the hole that
you're in, instead of getting in deeper and deeper.

But I am enjoying this, watching you be an idiot.

.