Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism

"vid512@xxxxxxxxx" <vid512@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1169027867.587994.307080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

you see, there are pretty many design problems with HLALib, i hoped you
will fix them for version 2, but you seem to keep ignoring them (I
already told you about some of them).

Maybe you don't understand the real problems.

Pointing to faults, in what this stinking nerd is doing, is
nothing but _giving him a hand_.

Admitting you would be right (i suppose you are, but i did
not took any look, as long as Static libs do not interrest
me, at all - even less a portable one -), the only possible
effect will be that he will _improve_ his product, the way
he always did with reusing others' works and others' ideas,
and so forth, get more power for achieving his plan for the
destruction of Assembly.

Why do you think he makes such a noise about his "Disassembler
Engine", his "Libray", and whatever else, if not for collecting
others' ideas? How can you fall in such a big trap?


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >

PS. Another "strange" thing was with releasing a version of
your job for MASM. What for? You want to become a famous .lib
Author, or what? Working for MASM is nothing but working AGAINST
Assembly. Is your ego more important, for you, than Assembly is?





.