Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- From: "vid512@xxxxxxxxx" <vid512@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jan 2007 03:36:57 -0800
Pointing to faults, in what this stinking nerd is doing, isI have no problem helping someone i don't agree with. In fact, i
nothing but _giving him a hand_.
advice people not to use his product. But still, if his library
becomes better, then overall quality of code increases.
And I don't do this for Randy, but for peope using his whatever-HLA-is.
Also many people reading this topic will see how i found particular
errors, and they will learn even from this bugreport.
How can you fall in such a big trap?I don't believe he is doing something against assembly on purpose,
that is your idea.
PS. Another "strange" thing was with releasing a version ofi believe you mean FASMLIB here.
your job for MASM. What for? You want to become a famous .lib
Author, or what? Working for MASM is nothing but working AGAINST
Assembly. Is your ego more important, for you, than Assembly is?
Generally, my point is to set FASMLIB as "assembly language library
standard", like libc is for C. I believe I do have some chances, as
FASMLIB
is only portable asm library, besides HLALib (which has many flaws that
are not present in FASMLIB)
Unfortunately, MASM is most used assembler, so for this purpose i just
have to support it. Also FASMLIB could help people stop using buggies
like MASM32LIB.
hope you understand now
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- From: William J. Leary Jr.
- Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- From: Betov
- Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- References:
- HLA StdLib2 criticism
- From: vid512@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- From: Betov
- HLA StdLib2 criticism
- Prev by Date: Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- Next by Date: yep
- Previous by thread: Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- Next by thread: Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|