Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism

"vid512@xxxxxxxxx" <vid512@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1169033817.901787.232440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

hope you understand now

No. Sorry.

First, if you are in some quest of personal "fame" (which
i couldn't understand, but which i could admit, being used
with the usually inflated ego of the Asmers), do you think
that, when our famous swindler will have improved his ***,
by the grace of your help, he will make pub for himself or
for you?

Second, what all of the Asmers around (the very few ones)
may need, is in no way any such obsolete *** like a .lib,
but collections of dedicated snippets. The form of a DLL
would have been perfect and would not have required any
port, at all, for being used as an AsmLib.dll, the very
same way it is done for LibC.dll.

Third, your justifications about the MASM version are
absurd and counter-productive. In case you would not know
like you should, MASM is virtually dead (hopefully), and
the project which virtually killed it, was, namely... FASM.
MASM will of course go on its curse to the grave the very
long way (like TASM, which was so funnyly given as the "most
popular Assembler around", at your own Board, so many years
after its dead), but providing materials for this programming
shame is nothing but helping at longing for the agony.

So, sorry, again, no, i don't understand, and i don't think
i will understand any better tomorrow.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Quantcast