Re: i disagree
- From: "¬a\\/b" <al@xxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:39:21 +0100
On 22 Jan 2007 09:42:08 -0800, "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
¬a\/b wrote:
i disagree with Randy Hyde because assembly has to dealSo you claim, but the language you've created doesn't do this.
in the first with low stuff, and there should be 1-1 assembly
instruction cpu-operation
for example "<a,b,c;" is pure assembly 1-1 cpu
its nasm traslation
" push eax
push ebx
push ecx "
is 1-1 because
<
a <-> push eax
b <-> push ebx
c <-> push ecx
and each symbol in "<a,b,c;" (but "<") identify a nasm assembly
instruction and so one cpu instruction
this is only an example; each instruction i use in my little assembly
traslator is like that above
So I guess you disagree with yourself :-)
i don't disagree with myself
Cheers,.
Randy Hyde
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: i disagree
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: i disagree
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: i disagree
- References:
- i disagree
- From: ¬a\\/b
- Re: i disagree
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- i disagree
- Prev by Date: Re: Future FASMLIB website
- Next by Date: Re: Future FASMLIB website
- Previous by thread: Re: i disagree
- Next by thread: Re: i disagree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|