Re: Moore's law resuccitated
- From: "Evenbit" <nbaker2328@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Jan 2007 17:28:17 -0800
On Jan 28, 3:50 pm, "Dragontamer" <prtig...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 27, 11:15 am, "santosh" <santosh....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6299147.stm
It looks like Moore's law is going to be kept alive for some moreLast time I remembered it, it was double speed every year and a
years.When did Moore's law change into "double the amount of transistors"?
half...
Technological Advance in *both* directions seem to go hand-in-hand.
And look at what somebody has been cooking up to take advantage of the
increased resources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/28/business/yourmoney/28slip.html?
_r=4&th&emc=th&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Nathan.
.
- References:
- Moore's law resuccitated
- From: santosh
- Re: Moore's law resuccitated
- From: Dragontamer
- Moore's law resuccitated
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems posting to CLAX...
- Next by Date: Re: Problems posting to CLAX...
- Previous by thread: Re: Moore's law resuccitated
- Next by thread: Re: Moore's law resuccitated
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|