Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
- From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Wannabee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:46:13 -0000
På Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:27:19 -0000, skrev ¬a\/b <al@xxx>:
so interest no one of you to do a safe sscanf?
Safe _nothing_ interesst me more.
i until now not have use it much so it will be full of errors...
but if the name of one string is the string itself i can write
somethig like
a1 dd 0, 0
int1 dd 0, 0
int2 dd 0, 0
"%d %d" db "%d %d", 0
_sscan<(a1, input_string, "%d %d", int1, int2); a<0#.error;
is it not easy?
:)))) Okey. you won the "most funny poster" ala award.
Now take the award, wrap it in a condome, and stuff it up your ars.
:)))
Ah.... the universe is feeeling nice again.
Thanks to the a liquer recomended by my grand father.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
- Next by Date: Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
- Next by thread: Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|