Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:27:19 +0100, "¬a\\/b" <al@xxx> wrote:
; int _sscan_m<(char** ove, char* input, char* fmt, ...)

so interest no one of you to do a safe sscanf?

i until now not have use it much so it will be full of errors...

but if the name of one string is the string itself i can write
somethig like

a1 dd 0, 0
int1 dd 0, 0
int2 dd 0, 0
"%d %d" db "%d %d", 0

_sscan<(a1, input_string, "%d %d", int1, int2); a<0#.error;

is it not easy?

i would said
_sscan<(a1, input_string, "%d %d", int1, int2); a!=2#.error;
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: a propose for a suppose far better sscanf in assembly
    ... but if the name of one string is the string itself i can write ... somethig like ... int1 dd 0, 0 ... int2 dd 0, 0 ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: DCount
    ... Make sure int1 is a number or use CLnginstead. ... Lamar wrote: ... int1 is an integer but I have also made it string. ... is a field where the data type is Text. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: Safe eval, or how to get list from string
    ... It returns values that are exactly in the config file, so get string ... int1 with quotes and characers: ...
    (comp.lang.python)