Re: Help me about this question.


Nathan baked some HLA:

A) If one writes code using HLA's "high level features", then one is
DAMNED for not "writing assembly(TM)".

B) On the other hand, if one *doesn't* use those "high level
features", then one is DAMNED for not using "an assembler(TM)".

Let's look at it another way...

If we avoid using _any_ assembly code and write using _only_ those
"high level features", is it possible to create a *valid* application
with HLA??

Sure, it may work as well. But if you disassemble the final code,
you find a lot of redundant crap and many useless detours.
Perhaps HLA could be used like any other inline assembler,
but weird teaching ends up in weird programming style,
and that's all about it.

__
wolfgang





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Concerning RosASM
    ... a rather strong distaste of the Win32 API, ... Writing a programs without any OS call does not make ... will not want to write applications in assembly even though I've only ... I'm well aware of your opinions when it comes to Randall Hyde and HLA, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: again, external symbols in hla
    ... All is fine when I writing in mylib.hla ... Is the segmentation fault during compilation or when you run your ... I'm assuming that this is during compilation (i.e., a bug in HLA). ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: The HLL Temptations
    ... > The work on HLA started in 1996, two years before you claim to have ... > started work on SpAsm; ... years for writing a so stupid and ridiculous ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Help me about this question.
    ... DAMNED for not "writing assembly". ... features", then one is DAMNED for not using "an assembler". ... But if you disassemble the final code, ... HLA compiler. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Ive seen the future...and it works! (was: my view on this assembler is blah)
    ... > Instead of writing pages and pages of bullshits, ... > how HLA is great, about how RosAsm License is weird, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)